Commercial “lion farms” across South Africa have never been fully audited, not all farms are registered, and corruption and poor record-keeping make it difficult for authorities to ensure facilities comply with the law.
Neil D’Cruze and Jennah Green
A man was arrested at the OR Tambo International Airport in Johannesburg, South Africa, on June 23, 2023 with five lion carcasses in his luggage.
He was about to board a flight to Vietnam, where the use of lion bones in traditional medicines is practised.
The seizure is commendable but highlights South Africa’s controversial legal industry of breeding lions in captivity.
Lions have been intensively farmed for commercial purposes in South Africa since the 1990s.
The wild animals are exploited as entertainment attractions for tourists, like cub petting and “walk with lions” experiences. Others are used for “canned” trophy hunting, where the lion is hunted in an enclosed space, with no chance of escape.
They are also used for traditional medicine in South Africa and internationally, where their body parts, particularly their bones, are exported to Asia. They’re used as ingredients in traditional Asian medicine, such as “wines” and tonics. These would usually contain tiger bone, but lion bones are being used as a substitute.
They’re also sold live.
According to official records in 2019, about 8 000 lions are being held in more than 350 facilities in South Africa. In contrast, the current wild population in the country is estimated to be about 3 500 lions.
Some farms also breed other big cats, including tigers, cheetahs, leopards, jaguars and hybrids.
The exact number of lions and other species on commercial “lion farms” across South Africa, however, is unknown. The industry has never been fully audited and not all farms are registered. In addition, corruption and a lack of proper record-keeping make it difficult for authorities to manage the industry and ensure facilities comply with the law.
A major problem is how the lion farming industry is being regulated in South Africa.
At a national level, governance of this industry has fallen under a patchwork of legislation, including the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act and regulations around threatened or protected species. With national and provincial concurrence, the regulation of the industry falls to the provincial nature conservation authorities.
But, as there is no centralised national system, transparency and enforcement are difficult. This results in grey areas that cloud the legality of the industry and its associated activities, contributing to confusion and non-compliance throughout.
Likewise, at an international level, lion bone exports are regulated under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). But the industry has been under scrutiny since 2019, when a high court in South Africa declared the lion bone export quota unconstitutional – due in large part to animal welfare concerns.
Consequently, since that time, the CITES export quota has been deferred, resulting in a “zero quota”. This means that lion skeletons cannot be legally exported for commercial purposes. And any subsequent exports originating from lion farms are illegal.
Lion farming in South Africa is controversial.
The industry has been estimated by some to contribute up to R500 million ($42 million) annually to the South African economy. However, in 2021, a high-level report compiled by relevant experts (including traditional leaders, lion farmers and scientists) said the industry posed a risk to public health (because of the potential transmission of zoonotic disease and lion attacks), “does not contribute meaningfully to the conservation of wild lions”, and was tarnishing the country’s reputation with “political and economic risks”.
This led to the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment announcing its intention, which the Cabinet later adopted, to immediately halt the “domestication and exploitation of lions, and to ultimately close all captive lion facilities in South Africa”.
But nothing has changed. The captive breeding and canned hunting of lions has continued.
The minister’s public announcement of South Africa’s intention to stop lion farming was a defining development regarding this controversial industry and its future. However, in late 2022, a ministerial task team was asked to “develop and implement a voluntary exit strategy for captive lion facilities”. This was the first time the word “voluntary” had been used in public government communications on the issue. It raised serious questions about whether the government was wavering in its stated intention to end commercial captive lion breeding.
It is highly doubtful whether a voluntary phasing out alone can halt the commercial exploitation of lions and establish a process to close lion farms, as recommended in the high level panel report. Instead, it should only be considered as an initial step. There should be a strategy which includes a mandatory time bound termination of the lion farming industry in its entirety.
Until then, to aid enforcement agencies and their efforts, lion farms should be required to stop breeding more lions and stop their canned hunting operations. - The Conversation
- Cruze is global head of wildlife research at World Animal Protection, and visiting researcher at Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, University of Oxford; Green is wildlife research manager at World Animal Protection, and visiting research fellow at the Manchester Metropolitan University
The Independent on Saturday