Bob Hewitt’s appeal against sentence dismissed

Former tennis star Bob Hewitt was convicted of raping two children and molesting a teenager. File picture: Masi Losi

Former tennis star Bob Hewitt was convicted of raping two children and molesting a teenager. File picture: Masi Losi

Published Jun 9, 2016

Share

 Bloemfontein - Former tennis star and convicted rapist Bob Hewitt is set to start serving his six-year prison sentence, after the Supreme Court of Appeal in Bloemfontein dismissed an appeal against his sentence on Thursday.

The 76-year-old former doubles Grand Slam winning champion was found guilty on two counts of rape and one of sexual assault in March last year, after abusing three women while he was their tennis coach in the 1980s and 90s.

The women were minors at the time.

In 2015 Judge Bert Bam convicted Hewitt in a damning judgment that labelled him a “violator of children”.

Hewitt was sentenced to six years in prison due to his advanced age, but also ordered by the court to pay R100 000 to the Department of Justice to fund anti-abuse campaigns.

In February, both the State and Hewitt’s defence filed the heads of argument that form their respective cases.

In their appeal argument, defence lawyers Johann Engelbrecht and Alwyn Griebenow insisted that Hewitt’s rape of two children was neither “cruel’, “callous” nor “extremely brutal”.

“It is respectfully submitted that... it is clear the learned judge... overemphasised the seriousness of the offences and the aspect of deterrence,” the lawyers wrote.

“It is respectfully submitted that this crime cannot be described as one involving extreme brutality within the meaning ascribed thereto in S v Wilken... Neither can it be argued that (Hewitt’s) conduct was cruel or callous. When (the first victim, Twiggy Tolken) told (Hewitt) that he was hurting her, he immediately desisted, and as far as (the second victim) is concerned, it is clear she sustained no vaginal injuries,” the heads of argument read.

Hewitt’s legal team argued that none of the victims appeared to have suffered any trauma after their childhood rapes, that the 76-year-old is too old to commit sexual offences again, and his poor health should be a factor in considering a non-custodial sentence.

They argued that a prison sentence would be far harsher for Hewitt than for a regular criminal, and his fall from grace under the gaze of the public should also be a mitigating factor.

“It cannot be denied that (Hewitt) belongs to a class, the members of which, whatever their race, feel deeply the shame and stigma of a prison sentence,” the arguments read.

State advocate Carina Coetzee submitted her arguments against Hewitt’s appeal, stating that others convicted of the rape of minors had faced life in prison.

She said Judge Bam had taken into account Hewitt’s health when sentencing him to six years in prison, and that the former tennis star's sickliness had not affected his ability to run his profitable citrus farm in the Eastern Cape.

Coetzee insisted Hewitt had not shown any remorse for his crimes, and that the victims had indeed been traumatised by Hewitt’s “atrocious and heinous” crimes.

Hewitt has been out on bail of R10 000 pending the outcome of his appeal.

He had been granted leave to appeal his sentence only, and not his conviction.

African News Agency and The Star

Related Topics: